<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Calling Beta Readers!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://dhyoung.net/2012/11/08/calling-beta-readers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://dhyoung.net/2012/11/08/calling-beta-readers/</link>
	<description>Scribo, ergo sum. Words and works of DH Young, scribbler at large.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:10:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: David		</title>
		<link>https://dhyoung.net/2012/11/08/calling-beta-readers/#comment-329</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://davidhaywoodyoung.com/?p=232#comment-329</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://dhyoung.net/2012/11/08/calling-beta-readers/#comment-327&quot;&gt;Brian Cornelison&lt;/a&gt;.

Not impossible. Right now I&#039;m looking more for reader reactions than critique or proofing from other writers, though. In fact, on the &quot;proofing&quot; front, I do this thing where I print the manuscript, start at the end of the book, &amp; look at one word at a time (still going backwards), then look at each sentence as a whole only after first inspecting all its constituent words. It takes a fair amount of time, but I don&#039;t think I leave too many typos once I&#039;m done, and occasionally I get an idea in the process. I&#039;m pretty happy with the approach right now.

Do you have something in particular you&#039;re trying to get feedback on? I could always take a look...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="ac-section-329"><p>In reply to <a href="https://dhyoung.net/2012/11/08/calling-beta-readers/#comment-327">Brian Cornelison</a>.</p>
<p>Not impossible. Right now I&#8217;m looking more for reader reactions than critique or proofing from other writers, though. In fact, on the &#8220;proofing&#8221; front, I do this thing where I print the manuscript, start at the end of the book, &#038; look at one word at a time (still going backwards), then look at each sentence as a whole only after first inspecting all its constituent words. It takes a fair amount of time, but I don&#8217;t think I leave too many typos once I&#8217;m done, and occasionally I get an idea in the process. I&#8217;m pretty happy with the approach right now.</p>
<p>Do you have something in particular you&#8217;re trying to get feedback on? I could always take a look&#8230;</p>
</div><div class="ac-textarea" id="ac-textarea-329" style="display: none;"><textarea>In reply to <a href="https://dhyoung.net/2012/11/08/calling-beta-readers/#comment-327">Brian Cornelison</a>.

Not impossible. Right now I'm looking more for reader reactions than critique or proofing from other writers, though. In fact, on the "proofing" front, I do this thing where I print the manuscript, start at the end of the book, & look at one word at a time (still going backwards), then look at each sentence as a whole only after first inspecting all its constituent words. It takes a fair amount of time, but I don't think I leave too many typos once I'm done, and occasionally I get an idea in the process. I'm pretty happy with the approach right now.

Do you have something in particular you're trying to get feedback on? I could always take a look...</textarea></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brian Cornelison		</title>
		<link>https://dhyoung.net/2012/11/08/calling-beta-readers/#comment-327</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Cornelison]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://davidhaywoodyoung.com/?p=232#comment-327</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi David, I also write.  Perhaps we could barter proofing for proofing...Brian]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="ac-section-327"><p>Hi David, I also write.  Perhaps we could barter proofing for proofing&#8230;Brian</p>
</div><div class="ac-textarea" id="ac-textarea-327" style="display: none;"><textarea>Hi David, I also write.  Perhaps we could barter proofing for proofing...Brian</textarea></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
